Consent is obtained legitimately when the following bullet points are met.

• The timeline of non-consent is the conception of birth, till the establishment of a true objective context of the entirety of the known tangible/intangible/other relevant realities that could potentially interact with that beings growth. With this objective requirement on the reality that they inhabit, the being has not technically given any consent from a legitimate standpoint within flawed depictions of reality, and are still lacking the ability to give consent due to the inherent immaturity that lacking knowledge entails.
• Consent is properly obtained if it is a result of the combined features of the entities conscious, and subconscious mind deciding and using a level of interaction that it defines proper, whether tangible, intangible, or otherwise. If this is up for question, a basic sense of consent is to be established from the entities preferred form, so that it can be used to establish further contexts of consent from its overall combined mass.
• Consent is only truly consent if the being willingly engaged with the entity in question, and was provided not only an out, but also the ability to give consent without forms of coercion, genetic fear mechanisms, or other mechanisms that stagnate/enhance its ability to make said consent with a clear, neutral head that is containing the objectivity that was implied in the above bullet point.
• An “enlightenment”, as stated above, is only legitimately objective if it is provided with a truly neutral overarching understanding of the basic forces that govern the tangible/intangible realities, and any other relevant realities that could potentially interact with that beings growth.
• If a being preforms a series of actions, such as a rite, with a fully objective state of conscious reality in their knowledge base, than the entities that are implied are of full rights to approach this being on the terms of the contract that established the rite in the first place, regardless of any mistakes that were made. If a rite was done improperly due to an instance in which an entity was not aware of the full objective context, even due to a mental deficiency, there is a scaling spectrum of action done to either render it inert, or to revive said entity to a point to establish whether they actually gave consent or not, in which the rite could forcefully continue, or be rendered inert regardless. Every effort should be made to prevent mental/physical pain/trauma/threatening behaviors, and other abusive mechanisms from being inflicted on the entity involved, in which action should only be taken neutrally to prevent this being from potentially further harming themselves, or creating an aggressive context in which the entities summoned would have to act to defend themselves. This should not extend into legality or pain, unless the being who preformed the rite improperly with a purposeful intent to trap/destroy/or otherwise purposefully impact the entities involved under the context of prey-predator ambush techniques. In the instance in which this happens, only a true contextual abuse contract can be established by the mentioned neutral council, in which the entire timeline will be evaluated for full psychological, physical, and spiritual context. Depending on the level of entity involved on either side, the timeline can include things not listed, depending on the implicit context they center on the surrounding con-sensually based environment.
• If a rite or a similar process is of a mechanism that is unable to be stopped in the above context, the entirety of the process needs to be restrained to a reality in which it cannot continually impact the surrounded consenting environment, until a solution to render it inert can be found. If it has negatively impacted those within the environment before it was restrained, reparations need to be immediately made with any entities influenced, hurt, or otherwise non-con-sensually changed through the process. This process needs to happen at the pace and consent of the victims involved, where the implicit rewards are weighed and given at the desire of the victims objectively stated needs.
• Within contract law, if there is an instance in which a being is caught forcefully placing individuals under a contract without the conception of consent as detailed above, there is an exception of past context, with an expectation that the entities involved potential actions will be aimed towards the establishment of the seed of free will that would have grown from their original growth within an educational system that practices the above rites of objectivity. The educational system of objectivity needs to be at a consistent, and non-intrusive wavelength that is at the pace and comfort of the being receiving it. There is a choice in this finality, in which the contract can be continued, or be rendered inert with equivalent reparations made towards the victimized entities involved.
• Unless the entity that preformed the lack of consent within contract law abides by the newly endowed enlightenment, with a grace period of thirteen months, there will be a scaling spectrum of “reminders” that lead to a potential end contract of being bound to each being that it rendered connected to the original non-consensual contracts that it created in the first place, tying it as a being of its power level to the entities involved as a neutral “ally” who operate under the context of the contract/s that it attempted to create non-con-sensually. However, due to the implications of its power influencing the beings actions, a restriction of presence and action needs to be enforced in order to completely render any action desired by the being who was non-con-sensually placed under it to be unaffected by the entity entailed.
• Reminders can either be given by an established neutral consistency established by the council, or given by the non-consensual individual/s with the approval of the council.
• If any being abuses the above punishment that is meant to support abused beings that had their free will taken away through the above context of abusive contracts, in which they render the punishment a reward for themselves to cater to their own desires, or potential/past desires, except in instances in which both the abused being and the abusive being are simultaneously experiencing a reward on the control and comfort on the terms of the abused beings context, then that being is restricted completely and has its tangible/intangible desires inherently tied to a neutrally established council that is approved by the entities involved that utilizes the objective sense of rule detailed above that establishes a egalitarian context that supports all the abused beings first, with the abused entities giving statements of desired implication to establish an equal end context that treats each abused entity differently specifically off of each of the levels of abusiveness that is implied by the abused punishment mechanism.
• Multiverse rule, and the inherent infinite variety of concepts that it brings, are to be evaluated for consent, and measured accordingly for their aesthetic worth. This aesthetic worth is based off of the spectrum of hedonism to morals, with an objective middle ground to establish context. Only an established civilization of functioning entities or consciousnesses may add a potential addition through a neutral cultural mechanism inherent to our rule that implies peace and patience when dealing with new entities. If it is found that there is a definition for something comparable to these concepts that has not been detailed, immediate reparations and actions need to be made in order to ensure that they are added to the list through a process that celebrates and defines their addition to their own requirements.
• Entities/consciousness is a concept that is subjective, as with multiverse rule, there needs to be a carefully established level of perspective given through neutral collaboration to further define this definition by potential additions to the realities involved.
• Multiverse is the inclusion of infinity, with regards to every conceivable tangible/intangible/dimensional/conceptual reality included, with every new iteration acknowledged and detailed in the above definition to ensure a complete overarching context for multiverse to exist in, as a self perpetuating idea of eternal spiraling conceptualization of context and non-context.